Life after the withdrawal from the European Union

Life after the withdrawal from the European Union

Barclys economic experts put forward an assumption that sterling is to yield a reverse effect within 12 months to $1.38 against the dollar and hit $1.32 by the end of 2017.

It is anticipated that sterling is to relapse to the level which hasn’t been seen since the Brexit vote by early next year, it is an assumption that some economic experts put forward stressing that sterling is  “significantly un-rated”.

It was said by Oxford economists that the currency was un-rated on a wide array of valuation score tests», at the same time Barclys specialists state that there is only one measure – sterling had only been lower against a currency basket in the course of the depths of the financial crunch and in the 1970s there has been found out the way from the financial turmoil.

In keeping with the formal statements it is anticipated that native currency would start to unwind on the assumption that starting contrastive tone approved by UK and Brussels went ahead as Brexit negotiating has been entered and new American president faced further encumbrance carrying out a reform.

In accordance with the official figures released a week ago sterling weakened stood at 104,075 comes to combine down at the end of March, which is close to the preceding week’s record high.

Barclys economic experts contemplate that national currency is to hit $1.32 by the end of 2017 and yield a reverse effect to $1.38 against the dollar within a year.

Also there is political risk which lies in the fact that the pound can surge to its previous pre-referendum value against the euro of €1.30 by early next 2018 year.

There’s also a belief among experts that the pound is up to 25pc downplayed against the dollar, keeping up with price differential and purchase power, at the same time there is a range of economic forces which suggest this downward bias should outride in the immediate future.

Following the Brexit vote lb plummeted against a wide range of foreign exchange, setting its value around $1.45 against the dollar which is considered to be the lowest figure since 1985.

Nevertheless, in Q1 legal tender has shown the signs of gain against dollar for the last 2 years in Q1, closing at $1.2542.

Specialists in the field of fiscal policy consider that the pound is to hike up to $1.32 against the dollar by the end of 2017, and in the forthcoming year it is anticipated to reach $1.35.

Of course we cannot deny the fact that there is the likelihood that our predictions cannot be correct to full measure in forthcoming period.

The taking-a-nose drive of pound’s cost following the Brexit vote was instrumental in narrowing Great Britain’s current balance-of-payments drain, which reduced up to ½ at the end of 2016.

Economic experts also suggest that such downswing has played its role in the process of pounds undervalue, that was also to some extent because of a pay boost on international investment.

Sterling gained ground against dollar this month for the very first time since 2005 at a time when there was observed a fall in US Treasury issuance.

Experts are sure that comparator between pound and dollar ($1.2735 against) bodes well for native currency’s move to nearly $1.34 to $1.35. Experts suggest that such figures are achievable.

The information placed above was based on the figures released last week; now let’s have a look the way situation has changed this week.

UK’s pound weakened against American currency this Thursday; financiers still feel uncertain about Britain’s decision to withdraw from European Union; even observed occurrence of economic health cannot outweigh the withdrawal. It is also supposed that the economic backdrop in Great Britain cannot be in safety until the country or European Union shows any premises for changes in their negotiating power.

The current situation with native currency is the following: Sterling has lost 0.1 percent at $1.2479.

Meantime, the bank of England governor addressed politicians with a request not to give in to protectionism on banking practices while parley UK’s withdrawal from the European Union and to hold open fiscal system.

One week has passed after Theresa May announced article 50 which has launched the process of withdrawal UK from the European Union; Mark Carney in his turn spoke to those who doesn’t want Great Britain to gain access to Europe after Brexit.In his speech he intended to pose London as an important aspect in global fiscal system, claiming that London is considered to be an investment banker for Europe. He also stressed the idea that there have been done enough to recover the monetary system in such a way that it complies with minimum standards required as part of global minimum demands for economic advancement, calling the financial sector of Great Britain a tower of strength for global fiscal system. Besides, Mark Carney emphasizes the idea that protectionism seems to be the easiest path to choose in situation like that, but at the same time we are to remember that the way which is challenging is always rewarding at long last. Carney as well asked firms dealing with transfrontier activities between UK and the EU to get ready for possibility Brexit negotiating starts fixing the 14 of July as the deadline to work out contingency plans.

We also would like to provide you with more details from his speech, for example, it was said that at present time we are to make the right decision by choosing the right path to go. There are two alternatives: the first one is the following: it is based on the principles of a new responsible monetary system , In his speech Carney refers to the alternative as to high road with more jobs, with steady progression in economic advancement and better risk management among the G20,which mainly consists of not poor nations. Also, there is one more alternative which can also be chosen and its essence is in the following: trust and cooperation there are neglected, innovation and trade conditions leaves much to be desired. Je refers to the road as to the “low”. Besides he stressed an idea that the last road mentioned would be so called “optimal” for all, with more less jobs offered, poor economic advancement and with more chances of domestic risk.

Carney also gave an opinion that London’s disruption from the European Union is considered to be a potential damage for the rest of European fiscal systems. On Friday he again emphasized the idea that it was due to UK’s contribution that more than 50 % of all equity and debt have been raised for European governments. He also intended to appeal the European Union and Great Britain to agree on terms which would allow money flow among the countries without any restrictions, and Carney also stressed the idea that he is not insisting on making a deal for financing facility that was divided from a wider selling agreement.

The withdrawal of Great Britain from the European Union promises to be a hard time for the country, so many companies have revealed plans aimed at moving gobs out of London. Things like that heralds for Great Britain the loss of opportunities for a normal economic development.

Lloyd’s of London and Royal London’s insure have already started to develop related companies outside Great Britain; at the same time hold houses JP Morgan and Citigroup are preoccupied with thinking over the repositioning of basic operations. To Frankfurt and Paris there have been relocated hundreds of bankers by Goldman Sach; and from London to Paris there have been relocated 1,000 investment of banking jobs by HSBC.

While we were working upon the article there has been updated information concerning financial life of Great Britain. And we would like to continue our news feed with the recent events.

Unrest concerning uncertainty of Great Britain’s social advancement has been escalated by dramatic decline in industrial production, situation with housing market leaves much to be desired and the rate of construction brunch for a year has also declined. 2 days ago economic experts revealed the information that there are all signs that UK’s economy is at low ebb starting with 2017, the withdrawal from the European Union didn’t bring to the table.

Having a look at the situation as ten months have passed since Brexit vote, the economic factors have dramatically fallen and at present time just indicate stringent situation within on enterprises from higher costs due to the fact that the pound has declined and import materials together with fuels have become high priced. Upturn in inflation has also affected the key force of economic advancement –consumers, so they are not eager to spend money as frequent as they used to do it some time ago on shopping, bars and restaurants.

The recognized numbers furnished bear witness to the fact that Great Britain nowadays undergo not the best time of its development, all the positive signs for advancement have been exceled by February’s figures, which indicated the slowdown in the economic development. Earlier there has been registered a boost in to outward trade from the weaker pound, but the situation achieved in January has been thwarted by February, in other words, by the situation created when the number of outward trade has dramatically fallen and the number of imported goods has risen.

So you can see that the current situation in Great Britain cannot be characterized as positive one. But we hope that the country will overcome the challenge and we are going to provide you with all fresh information concerning financial life of Great Britain.

Referred sources:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.